Morphological attributes of Glycine max (Soybean)

Gazala Bashir

Author info »

Introduction

Heavy metals are elements that are found naturally on Earth [1]. Because they are toxic, persistent, and non-degradable, heavy metals are among the most dangerous contaminants in the aquatic environment [2,3]. Significant hazards to the environment and agriculture are posed by heavy metal contamination of the air, water, and soil as a result of rising urbanization and industrialization. Due to its persistence and high toxicity, heavy metal pollution in soils can have detrimental effects on nearby ecosystems, groundwater, agricultural productivity, and human health. This has a significant effect on humanity because agriculture cannot be sustained without healthy soils [4]. According to numerous studies, the main risk associated with heavy metal contamination of agricultural soils is toxic metal accumulation in crops. Soybean is frequently grown in stressful environments; such as soils with high arsenic concentrations [5,6]. Soybean (Glycine max) contains protein content of approximately 35-50% of protein depending on its origin. It is a significant source of protein for humans and is also beneficial for animal nutrition. A good source of several necessary amino acids is soybean protein. Phytoestrogens, conjugated carbohydrates, inorganic compounds, fatty acids (soybean oil), and inorganic substances are also found in large quantities in soybean. A significant amount of unsaturated fatty acids, B vitamins, and minerals like nitrogen, potassium, magnesium, iron, calcium, and phosphorus enhance their nutritional value [7]. Vegetable soybean is regarded as a functional food crop because it is abundant in phytochemicals that are good for humans [8]. The growth of soybean plants exposed to arsenic has shown severe damage: crop yield and root and shoot biomass are both significantly reduced [9] heavy metals includes lead and chromium are potentially toxic and are the main sources of environmental pollution. One of the most prevalent and widely dispersed toxic elements in soil is lead (Pb). Plant morphology, growth, and photosynthetic processes are negatively impacted by it. Spartiana alterniflora and Pinus helipensis seed germination are known to be inhibited by lead [10]. Pb reduces the dry mass of roots and shoots, germination index, percentage of germination, and root/shoot length. Some plant metabolic processes, including the synthesis of nitrogenous compounds, the metabolism of carbohydrates, and the absorption of water, are inhibited by lead [11,12]. In addition to altering soil microorganisms and their activities, which worsened soil fertility, pb contamination in soils also had a direct impact on changes in physiological indices, which further decreased yield [13]. There are many different ways that Cr toxicity in plants can be seen, from decreased yield to effects on leaf and root growth to inhibition of enzymatic activities and mutagenesis. Chromium adverse effects on plant height and shoot growth [14]. The purpose of this research was to look at how lead and chromium stress affected the morphological characteristics of soybean.

Materials and Methods

Plant materials and experimental design

Certified seeds of three varieties of soybean (Glycine max) (JS:335), (JS:80-21), (JS:75-46) were procured from Vindhya herbal testing laboratory and nursery Bhopal, M.P India. Seeds were surface sterilized with 0.1% HgCl2 (mercuric chloride) for two minutes. The seeds were washed with distilled water twice and air dried. Soil was divided in 27 parts of 4 kg each. 3 parts each were treated with four different concentrations i.e., 50 ml, 100 ml, 150 ml and 200 ml of two heavy metals Lead (II) nitrate and Potassium dichromate. Seeds were sown at 2-3 cm dept in pot and watering was done once in two days till transfer of plantlets for experiments all experimental pots were placed outdoor for growing after reaching the maturity stage the plants were removed and were used for morphological analysis. Total length, number of nodes, number of leaves and shape of leaves of plants was observed as per study of Kumar et al., [15].

Results and Discussion

Comparative effect of heavy metals on morphology of different varieties of soybean plant

Effect of heavy metal on total length of plant: The effect of different concentrations of heavy metals (lead and chromium) on the total length of treated plants in comparison to control were evaluated after harvesting. The maximum reduction in total length of plant was observed at 200 ml treatment in JS:335 followed by JS:75-46 and JS:80-21 under lead stress. Similarly, in chromium treatment maximum reduction in total length of treated plant were observed at 200 ml treatment in JS:335 followed by JS:75-46, minimum decrease at 200 ml was observed in JS:80-21. as shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1: Comparative effect of different concentrations of Lead and Chromium on total length of three varieties (JS:335, JS:80-21, JS:75-46) of Glycine max in comparison to control.

Effect of heavy metal on number of nodes of plant: The effect of different concentrations of heavy metals (lead and chromium) on the number of nodes of treated plants in comparison to control were evaluated after harvesting. The maximum reduction in number of nodes of treated plant was observed at 200 ml treatment in JS:335 followed by JS:75-46, minimum reduction in JS:80-21 under lead stress. Similarly, in chromium treatment maximum reduction in number of nodes of treated plant were observed at 200 ml treatment in JS:335 followed by JS:75-46, minimum decrease at 200 ml was shown in JS:80-21 as shown in Figure 2.

Figure 2: Comparative effect of different concentrations of Lead and Chromium on number of nodes of three varieties (JS: 335, JS: 80-21, JS: 75-46) of Glycine max in comparison to control.

Effect of heavy metal on number of leaves of plant: The effect of different concentrations of heavy metals (lead and chromium) on the number of leaves of treated plants in comparison to control were evaluated after harvesting. The maximum reduction in number of leaves of treated plant was observed at 200 ml treatment in JS:335 followed by JS:75-46, minimum reduction in JS:80-21 under lead stress. Similarly, in chromium treatment maximum reduction in number of leaves of treated plant were observed at 200 ml treatment in JS:335 followed by JS:75-46, minimum decrease at 200 ml was shown in JS:80-21 as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3: Comparative effect of different concentrations of Lead and Chromium on number of leaves of three varieties (JS:335, JS:80-21, JS:75-46) of Glycine max in comparison to control.

Effect of heavy metal on shape leaves: The effect of different concentrations of heavy metals (lead and chromium) on the shape of leaves of treated plants in comparison to control were evaluated after harvesting. Pb and Cr treated plants showed heart and oval shaped leaves over the ovoid shaped leaves in untreated plants as shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Shape of leaves of treated plants in comparison to control were evaluated after harvesting.

The three types of Glycine max (soybean) treated with four different quantities of lead (Pb), chromium (Cr), and water (50 ml, 100 ml, 150 ml, and 200 ml) were used in the current investigation (Cr). In 2015, Kumar et al., [15] conducted research that revealed morphological features that were observed following the heavy metal treatment in terms of overall length, number of nodes, number of leaves, and shape of leaves.

The data included in Table 2 demonstrates that the Glycine max plant exhibits a reduction in root length, number of nodes, and leaf number at all concentrations over control following lead (Pb) and chromium (Cr) treatments (50, 100, 150, and 200 ml). In the treated plants, the shape of the leaves was also altered. More harmful than chromium was found to be lead (Pb). Highest reduction in total length of plant with Pb treatment was seen at 200 ml in JS:335, followed by 15.8% at 200 ml in JS:75-46, and 12.8% at 200 ml of heavy metal in JS:80-21. The number of nodes was reduced to a maximum of 35.71% at 200 ml dosages in JS:335, followed by a minimum reduction of 20.0% at 200ml in JS:80-21, and a maximum reduction of 21.0% at 200 ml in JS:75-46. In terms of the number of leaves, JS:335 observed the greatest reduction at 200 ml of Pb (37.5%) and the least reduction at 200 ml (23.52%).

Table 2: The effect of different concentrations of heavy metals (Lead and Chromium) on total length of plant.

Similarly, in case of Cr treatment maximum decrease of 21.05% in total length of treated plants was observed at 200 ml treatment in JS:335 followed by 15.7% in JS:75-46, and minimum decrease of 12.8% at 200 ml was shown in JS:80-21. The obtained data of number of nodes showed that more reduction was found at 200 ml (28.57) in JS:335 and JS:75-46 and minimum decrease at 200 ml (20.0%) in JS:80-21 plants. The maximum decrease in the number of leaves was also found at 200 ml (31.25) in JS:335 and JS:75-46 and minimum (23.52%) at 200 ml in JS:80-21treated plants. Besides the reduction in the total length, no. of nodes and leaves in Pb and Cr treated plants, the shape of leaves also changed. Pb and Cr treated plants showed heart and oval shaped leaves over the ovoid shaped leaves in untreated plants. The investigation revealed significant reduction in total length for Glycine max plants in Pb treatment than Cr treated plants. A concentration dependent decrease in total length over control was observed in all the three varieties (JS:335), (JS:80-21), (JS:75-46) of Glycine max. The results obtained from this study indicate that excess of heavy metal causes a variety of toxicity symptoms in plants, such as reduced growth. According to Eun et al., the reduction in plant growth during stress is due to low water potential, hampered nutrient uptake and secondary stress such as oxidative stress. Pb treatment had a greater influence on these parameters than both Cr and Pb treatments combined. It is widely known that the growth characteristics fresh mass, dry mass, shoot and root length, photosynthetic pigments, and protein are all decreased by both Cr and Pb.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our results indicated that the exposure of Glycine max to Pb and Cr resulted in a decrease in total length, number of nodes and number of leaves. The shape of leaves in case of treated plants was also changed from ovoid to heart and oval shapes, at higher concentration of heavy metals. Among the three varieties (JS:335), (JS:80-21), (JS:75-46) of Glycine max, JS:335 showed maximum reduction and the JS:80-21 showed least less reduction in the growth. Lead proved more toxic than chromium for all the three varieties of Glycine max. To examine the correct hazardous signal pathways of heavy metals revealed by plants treated, further research of the molecular mechanism is still required.

References

1. Vitousek PM, Mooney HA, Lubchenco J, et al. Human domination of Earth's ecosystems. Sci. 1997; 277(5325):494-499.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

2. Proshad R, Islam S, Tusher TR, et al. Appraisal of heavy metal toxicity in surface water with human health risk by a novel approach: a study on an urban river in vicinity to industrial areas of Bangladesh. Toxin Rev. 2021; 40(4):803-819.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

3. Venkateswarlu V, Venkatrayulu C. Bioaccumulation of heavy metals in edible marine fish from coastal areas of Nellore, Andhra Pradesh, India. GSC Biol Pharm Sci. 2020;10(1):018-24.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

4. Gunawardana B, Singhal N, Johnson A. Effects of amendments on copper, cadmium, and lead phytoextraction by Lolium perenne from multiple-metal contaminated solution. Int J Phytoremediation. 2011; 13(3):215-232.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

5. Masuda T, Goldsmith PD. World soybean production: area harvested, yield, and long-term projections. Int Food Agribusiness Manag Rev. 2009; 12(1030-2016-82753):1-20.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

6. Bundschuh J, Litter MI, Parvez F, et al. One century of arsenic exposure in Latin America: A review of history and occurrence from 14 countries. Sci Total Environ. 2012; 429:2-35.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

7. Rucinski P. Annual Oilseeds and Products Report, FAS, Warsaw, Poland, 2018.

   [Google Scholar]

8. Beckman KB, Ames BN. Oxidative decay of DNA. J Biol Chem. 1997; 272(32):19633-19636.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

9. Talano MA, Cejas RB, González PS, et al. Arsenic effect on the model crop symbiosis Bradyrhizobium–soybean. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2013; 63:8-14.

   [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

10. Mrozek Jr E, Funicelli NA. Effect of zinc and lead on germination of Spartina alterniflora Loisel seeds at various salinities. Environ Exp Bot. 1982; 22(1):23-32.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

11. Sharma P, Dubey RS. Lead toxicity in plants. Braz J Plant Physiol. 2005; 17:35-52.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

12. Hamid N, Bukhari N, Jawaid F. Physiological responses of Phaseolus vulgaris to different lead concentrations. Pak J Bot. 2010; 42(1):239-246.

    [Google Scholar]

13. Majer BJ, Tscherko D, Paschke A, et al. Effects of heavy metal contamination of soils on micronucleus induction in Tradescantia and on microbial enzyme activities: a comparative investigation. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen. 2002; 515(1-2):111-124.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar] [PubMed]

14. Rout GR, Samantaray S, Das P. Differential chromium tolerance among eight mungbean cultivars grown in nutrient culture. J Plant Nutr. 1997; 20(4-5):473-483.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]

15. Kumar A, Pandey A, Aochen C, et al. Evaluation of genetic diversity and interrelationships of agro-morphological characters in soybean (Glycine max) genotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci, India Section B: Biol Sci. 2015; 85:397-405.

    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]